Australia’s Federal Government seeks feedback on the use of genetic test results by insurers

Australia’s Federal Government has opened consultation on the impacts of life insurers utilising genetic test results in underwriting.

Under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 consumers have a responsibility to provide information requested by life insurers, including any genetic testing results. In 2018, a report by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services identified concerns that life insurers using genetic tests in underwriting was negatively impacting participation in health research projects involving genetic testing.

In 2019, Australia’s life insurance industry introduced a partial Moratorium on the requirement to disclose genetic testing results. Life insurers could only request or use the results of a genetic test if the total amount of cover a person has exceeded set thresholds. The Moratorium also stated that life insurers would not require or encourage applicants to take a genetic test as part of the application.  The Moratorium was introduced due to concerns that people would not undergo genetic testing for personal health reasons or participate in medical research that involved genetic testing because they feared that it could negatively impact their ability to obtain affordable life insurance.

A report by researchers at Monash University investigating the impact of the Moratorium found it is discouraging consumers from participating in clinical genetic testing and in medical research which involves genetic testing. The report also found that life insurers were not complying with the Moratorium, and were asking applicants about genetic test results when the applications fell below the financial thresholds. The report also deemed the financial limits were too low. The report’s recommendations include the Government amending legislation to prohibit insurers from using genetic or genomic test results to discriminate between applicants for risk-rated insurance and that the Government consider ensuring insurers are subject to a positive duty to not discriminate. Consultation is open until 31 January 2024.

We spoke to Russell Hutchinson to get a New Zealand perspective on this issue:

Currently New Zealand has no legislated approach to genetic testing. There are similar consumer movements to that in Australia, which highlight the risks to consumers and their families when they delay obtaining genetic tests because they are concerned about the impact on their ability to obtain insurance coverage. A good synopsis of this from the medical viewpoint is given in this Radio New Zealand piece. It does not discuss the value of having a functioning insurance sector or examine how this relies on the ability to charge different premiums for different risks or in some cases, decline to insure a person. Naomi Ballantyne offers a succinct summary of an underwriter’s perspective in this article at Good Returns.

Occasionally, consumer fears may drive choices which are also damaging to the insurance market – for example, delaying a test to take out coverage and then lapsing the coverage if the test results show no increased likelihood of developing the condition. There may be value in offering some form of reassurance to consumers to limit the impact of genetic testing on insurance. Personally, right now, I would encourage anyone contemplating a genetic test to place their health first and obtain the test.

The Financial Services Council (FSC) regularly reviews its stance and industry guidelines on genetic testing to ensure they reflect best practice globally; they have reiterated that it is important insurers understand a customer's risk profile as part of the underwriting process.

"Some insurers may ask customers to disclose known information about the results of their genetic tests. This is consistent with asking customers other questions about their risk profile - for example, their family history.”

"Genetic testing is not something that any of our members ask their customers to carry out. Overall, FSC believes a fair position is one that balances the interests of consumers and the medical community to advance genetic science, and which manages financial risks to insurers and all policyholders."

Recently the FSC has held a discussion group with representatives from the insurance industry and the medical community to discuss the challenges that genetic testing present. A working group has been established to improve outcomes from genetic testing. Currently, RiskInfoNZ is running a poll to find out if people will see a time when genetic tests will play a part in clients applying for life insurance.

 

More daily news:

Gold Band Finance is the first non-bank deposit taker to get an FMA Financial Institution Licence

Proposed changes to the NZCFS Level 5 will be published on the Ringa Hora website early next year

David Greenslade says updates to the current New Zealand Certificate in Financial Services (Level 5) hold no red flags

Research finds inflation and the cost of living are the most significant obstacles to national economic performance

Hāpai Te Hauora calls on the government to reconsider repealing aspects of NZ's Smokefree legislation

Previous
Previous

Legal and regulatory update for the life and health insurance sector

Next
Next

AMP settles with Australian financial advisers for A$100 million